Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sa.32/1, ss.293-302, 2025 (Hakemli Dergi)
The objective of this study is to test MacDonald, Rabinowitz and Listhaug’s (1995)
argument suggesting a link between voter sophistication and two models of spatial theory of
party competition, the proximity model and the directional model. MacDonald and his
colleagues argued that as the proximity model is more cognitively demanding than the
directional one, it provides a more eligible formula for educated and politically
knownledgeable voters. Although they did not find supporting evidence for their argument,
we suggest that this may be due to their case selection and methodological preferences. We
think that in a country, where there are striking implications of differences between
education levels and there is high political knowledge, a different picture may emerge. It is
also suggested here that an alternative measurement for political sophistication, which was
constructed by the multiplication of education and actual political knowledge, would be a
more objective and appropriate proxy for voter sophistication. In this research, 2015 round
of Comparative Study of Election Systems (CSES) data for Türkiye were employed. The
final dataset holds answers of 249 respondents, which are voters of the four most-voted
political parties in Türkiye. The findings provide proofs largely confirming the MacDonald
and his colleagues’ argument.