Copy For Citation
Ozdemir S., UZAL N., Gokcek O. B.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, vol.96, no.7, pp.1927-1935, 2021 (SCI-Expanded)
-
Publication Type:
Article / Article
-
Volume:
96
Issue:
7
-
Publication Date:
2021
-
Doi Number:
10.1002/jctb.6716
-
Journal Name:
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
-
Journal Indexes:
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Core, Chimica, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Computer & Applied Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
-
Page Numbers:
pp.1927-1935
-
Keywords:
slaughterhouse wastewater, membrane treatment, nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, dead‐, end filtration, MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS, ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES, RECOVERY
-
Abdullah Gül University Affiliated:
Yes
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the present study, the performance of the membrane process, one of the advanced treatment methods that can enable the reuse of slaughterhouse wastewater, was evaluated. The wastewater was treated using ultrafiltration (UF) (10, 50 kDa), nanofiltration (NF) (150-300 DA) and reverse osmosis (RO) (500 kDa) membranes alone, and UF + NF, UF + RO membrane combinations at different pressures. In addition to rejection and permeate flux considerations, it was attempted to select the most effective membrane by performing scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared, contact angle, and atomic force microscopy analyses of the membranes used.